ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF INFORMATION SECURITY OF COURT ACTIVITIES

Dmytro PRYPUTEN

PRYPUTEN D. (2023), ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF INFORMATION SECURITY OF COURT ACTIVITIES, Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, № 1, 144-149

DOI: 10.31733/2078-3566-2023-1-144-149

 

ABSTRACT. The article is devoted to the study of the current state of administrative and legal regulation of the information provision of courts, highlighting the problems in this area and proposing ways to solve them. The article notes that it is precisely thanks to the information provision of courts that today the administration of justice is carried out by the courts of Ukraine, and the implementation of such an important judicial principle as transparency and openness is ensured. It is indicated that thanks to the existing system of information provision of the courts, the participants in the court process can apply to the court, get the necessary information about the progress of the case without coming to the court, and the court will consider the case in a reasonable time and make a legal and justified decision. Statistical indicators are given regarding the forms of use of information resources by courts during the administration of justice. It is indicated that proper administrative and legal regulation of the information provision of courts contributes to the normal functioning of courts in modern conditions of war and ensures the administration of justice in our country. It is suggested that the administrative-legal regulation of the information support of courts should be understood as a set of legal acts that regulate the grounds and procedure for the administration of justice in an electronic way, regulate the activities of authorized subjects and the functioning of automated information systems in order to ensure the activity of courts in the consideration and resolution of various categories of cases. The article emphasizes that the creation of an effective system of information support for the activity of courts is a guarantee of the effectiveness of their functioning, the continuity and efficiency of the administration of justice, adhering to the principles of the rule of law, transparency and openness, and the reasonableness of the terms of consideration of cases. It is indicated that the spread of information and telecommunication technologies causes the existence of many problematic issues. In order to solve them, it is necessary to take into account foreign experience and best foreign practices.

Keywords: administrative and legal regulation, provision, information, information provision, courts, justice.

    References:

  1. Androshchuk, O. V., Kondratenko, Yu. V., Holovchenko, O. V., Vorona, T. O., Petrushen, M. V. (2014) Informatsiini tekhnolohii ta yikh vplyv na rozvytok suspilstva [Information technologies and their impact on the development of society]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Tsentru voienno-stratehichnykh doslidzhen Natsionalnoho universytetu oborony Ukrainy imeni Ivana Cherniakhovskoho. № 1(50). рр. 42–47. URL: http://www.irbis
    nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF= 10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=Znpcvsd _2014_1_7. [in Ukr.].

  2. Iak pratsiuie ukrainska sudova systema pid chas viiny [How the Ukrainian judicial system works during the war]. PRAVO.UA. URL: https://pravo.ua/iak-pratsiuie-ukrainska-sudova-systema-pid chas-viiny/. [in Ukr.].
  3. Rekomendatsiia № R (84) 5 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam shchodo pryntsypiv tsyvilnoho sudochynstva, spriamovanykh na vdoskonalennia funktsionuvannia pravosuddia vid 28 liutoho 1984 r [Recommendation No. R (84) 5 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to the member states on the principles of civil justice aimed at improving the functioning of justice dated February 28, 1984]. URL : https://rd.ua/storage/lessons/ 102/597щодо%20прнципі%20цивільного%20судоинства%201984%20р..pdf. [in Ukr.].
  4. Smokovych, M. I. (2020) Elektronne sudochynstvo. Suchasni vyklyky ta aktualni problemy sudovoi reformy v Ukraini [Electronic justice. Modern challenges and actual problems of judicial reform in Ukraine] : materialy IV Mizhnar. naukovo.-prakt. konf. (m. Chernivtsi, 16 zhovtnia 2020 r.); redkol. : O. V. Shcherbaniuk (holova), L. H. Bzova (vidp. sekr.) ta in. Kyiv : Vydavnytstvo VAITE. 356 р. [in Ukr.].
  5. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy vid 28 chervnia 1996 r. [The Constitution of Ukraine dated June 28, 1996]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 1996. № 30. Art. 141. [in Ukr.].
  6. Pchelin, V. (2016) Pravovi zasady informatsiinoho zabezpechennia administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy [Legal principles of information provision of administrative proceedings of Ukraine]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. № 8. рр. 120–124. [in Ukr.].
  7. Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv [About the judiciary and the status of judges] : Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 r. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#n1452. [in Ukr.].
  8. Polozhennia pro avtomatyzovanu systemu dokumentoobihu sudu [Regulations on the automated system of court document circulation] : zatverdzheno Rishenniam Rady suddiv Ukrainy vid 26.11.2010 r. № 30. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/vr030414-10#Text. [in Ukr.].
  9. Pro dostup do sudovykh rishen [About access to court decisions] : Zakon Ukrainy vid 22.12.2005 r. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3262-15#Text. [in Ukr.].
  10. Pro zakhyst informatsii v informatsiino-komunikatsiinykh systemakh [About the protection of information in information and communication systems] : Zakon Ukrainy vid 05.07.1994 r. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80/94-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text. [in Ukr.].
  11. Khylko, M. (2021) Aktualizatsiia pytannia informatyzatsii sudiv ta vprovadzhennia elektronnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini [Update on the issue of informatization of courts and implementation of electronic justice in Ukraine]. Hromadska dumka pro pravotvorennia. № 2(207). рр. 4–9. URL: https://nbuviap.gov.ua/images/informaciyni_vidanya/grom_dumka/Gromadska_dumka_2021_2.pdf. [in Ukr.].
  12. Korshun, A. O. (2022) Pryntsyp hlasnosti i vidkrytosti diialnosti orhaniv sudovoi vlady [The principle of transparency and openness of judicial authorities] : monohrafiia. Kyiv : Khai-Tek Pres. 192 р. [in Ukr.].
  13. Nalyvaiko, I. (2022) The role of civil society institutions in preventing and combating corruption in public authorities. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo. № 2. рр. 27–30.
  14. Ratsa, V. A. (2016) Hnoseolohichnyi aspekt poniattia «informatsiine zabezpechennia diialnosti sudiv» [The epistemological aspect of the concept of «informational support of court activities»]. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva. № 4. URL: http://vkslaw.knu.ua/images/verstka/4_2016_Ratsa.pdf. [in Ukr.].
  15. Makharynets, D. A. (2020) Mekhanizm informatsiinoho zabezpechennia administratyvnoho sudochynstva [The mechanism of information support of administrative proceedings]. Yurydychna nauka. № 4(106). Vol. 1. рр. 110–116. [in Ukr.].
  16. Nalyvaiko, L. R. (2014) Transparency as a democratic standard of the government functioning. Evropský Politický a Právní Diskurs. Svazek 1., 4. vydání. рр. 51–62.
Views: 2,267