PECULIARITIES OF THE FUNCTIONING OF THE INSTITUTE OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY IN THE PARADIGM OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Oksana STRELCHENKO

STRELCHENKO O. (2023), PECULIARITIES OF THE FUNCTIONING OF THE INSTITUTE OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY IN THE PARADIGM OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW; Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, № 2, 178-185

DOI: 10.31733/2078-3566-2023-2-178-185

 

ABSTRACT. The article describes the conceptual principles of the functioning of administrative responsibility in the modern doctrine of administrative law, which has a long history of its implementation and transformation. In the process of integration of Ukraine into the world community it is necessary to re-understand the essence of the functioning of the institution of administrative responsibility in the modern legal system and define it as a way of ensuring legal order in those areas of public administration that needed administration, as well as the use of an appropriate means of ensuring the effective protection of human and citizen rights and freedoms, in cases of bringing her to administrative responsibility. In order to renew and change the paradigm of administrative law and to focus it on ensuring the rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests of citizens, the post-Soviet system of administrative law is being changed to meet the modern demands of society. Accordingly, during such active reformatory changes, the issue of the peculiarities of the functioning of the institution of administrative responsibility, which is caused by a significant change in the purpose of administrative law in the administration of society, also becomes relevant.

Despite all the changes taking place in society, administrative responsibility is an inseparable part of legal responsibility, which manifests itself in the appropriate attitude of persons to the performance of their duties, as well as responsibility for the proper performance by a person of the duties assigned to them. In the course of the subject’s activity, contrary to regulatory and legal requirements, retrospective responsibility for an already committed administrative offense arises. Summarizing the above, it should be noted that the essence of administrative responsibility is the offender’s incurring administrative penalties and measures of influence applied to minors, the purpose of which is to prevent administrative offenses both by the offender himself and by other persons, and to educate individuals in the spirit of compliance with the norms of the current legislation of Ukraine , respect for the rules of cohabitation, etc. In general, the research and formulation of the legal category of administrative responsibility is the result of rather painstaking work by administrative scientists, who to this day do not find a unified position regarding its formulation. That is why we propose the author’s interpretation of administrative responsibility as a type of legal responsibility, for illegal acts committed in the form of violations of the norms of current administrative legislation, for which the authorized subjects of public administration have the right to apply moral and material organizational restrictions in order to prevent new offenses and educate of the person who committed the offense, in the spirit of compliance with the norms of the current legislation.

Keywords: responsibility, legal responsibility, administrative responsibility, recovery, restrictions, misdemeanor.

    References:

  1. Administratyvna vidpovidalnist [Аdministrative responsibility] : multymed. navch. posibnyk. URL: https://arm.naiau.kiev.ua/books/adm-vidpov/pages/rozdil_1.html. [in Ukr.].
  2. Strelchenko, O. H., Bukhtiiarova, I. H. (2023) Kharakterystyka administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti za pravoporushennia u sferi vyborchoho protsesu [Characteristics of administrative responsibility for offenses in the field of the election process]. Naukovi innovatsii ta peredovi tekhnolohii. № 1(15). рр. 167–175. [in Ukr.].
  3. Ivanova, O. I. (2012) Yurydychna vidpovidalnist yak riznovyd sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti [Legal responsibility as a type of social responsibility]. Visnyk Akademii advokatury Ukrainy. № 3(25). рр. 26–21. [in Ukr.].
  4. Strohovych, M. S. (1979) Sushchnost yurydycheskoi otvetstvennosty [The essence of legal responsibility]. Sovetskoe hosudarstvo y pravo. № 5. рр. 72–78.
  5. Baulin, Yu. V. (2013) Yurydychna vidpovidalnist: problemy vykliuchennia ta zvilnennia [Legal liability: problems of exclusion and release] / kol. avt. ; vidp. red. Yu. V. Baulin. Donetsk : PP «VD «Kalmius», 2013. 424 р. [in Ukr.].
  6. Matseliukh, I. A. (2017) Spivvidnoshennia poniat sotsialnoi, yurydychnoi ta pravovoi vidpovidalnosti v naukovomu dyskursi [Correlation of concepts of social, legal and legal responsibility in scientific discourse]. Publichne pravo. № 1(25). рр. 243–249. [in Ukr.].
  7. Kalienichenko, L.I. (2017) Yurydychna vidpovidalnist yak dynamichne pravove yavyshche [Legal responsibility as a dynamic legal phenomenon]. Forum prava : elektron. nauk. fakhove vyd. № 3. рр. 67–71. URL: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe? [in Ukr.].
  8. Rabinovych, P. M. (2011) Vyiavlennia sotsialnoi sutnosti pravovykh i derzhavnykh yavyshch – holovne zavdannia yurydychnoi nauky [Identifying the social essence of legal and state phenomena is the main task of legal science]. Yurydychna nauka. № 1 (1). рр. 7–13. [in Ukr.].
  9. Kolpakov, V. K. (2008) Administratyvna vidpovidalnist (administratyvno-deliktne pravo) [Administrative liability (administrative tort law)] : navch. posibnyk. Kyiv : Yurinkom Inter. 256 р. [in Ukr.].
  10. Kuzmenko, O.V. (2016) Administratyvna vidpovidalnist [Administrative responsibility] : kurs lektsii. Kyiv : Yurinkom Inter. 568 р. [in Ukr.].
  11. Lukianets, D. M. (2001) Instytut administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti: problemy rozvytku [Institute of administrative responsibility: problems of development] : monohrafiia. Kyiv : Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V.M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy. 220 р. [in Ukr.].
  12. Matios, A. (2006) Zmist i sutnist administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti [Content and essence of administrative responsibility]. Pravo Ukrainy. № 2. рр. 9–12. [in Ukr.].
  13. Koliushko, I., Banchuk, O. (2008) Poniattia administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti ta administratyvnoho pravoporushennia v suchasnomu ukrainskomu pravi [The concept of administrative responsibility and administrative offense in modern Ukrainian law]. Pravo Ukrainy. № 4. рр. 31–36. [in Ukr.].
  14. Kolomoiets, T. O. (2011) Administratyvna vidpovidalnist [Administrative responsibility] : navch. posibnyk. Kyiv : Istyna. 184 р. [in Ukr.].
Views: 34