INSTITUTIONAL CONTINUITY IN THE FIELD OF CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTION

Vasyl KOSTYTSKYI, Denys STRYZHEUS

KOSTYTSKYI V., STRYZHEUS D. (2023), INSTITUTIONAL CONTINUITY IN THE FIELD OF CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTION;
Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, №3, 123-130

DOI: 10.31733/2078-3566-2023-3-123-130

 

ABSTRACT. The article deals with a problem of great importance for modern jurisprudence – the stability of legal conditions and guarantees of institutional protection of subjective civil rights as key legal opportunities of a person in the conditions of a market economy and civil society. Systemically related to the category of such protection is the issue of continuity of institutional protection of civil rights (continuity), which reflects legal ideas about the established, stable, continuous activity of the relevant institutions.

Such continuity corresponds to the principles of the rule of law, which is recognized and operates in Ukraine in accordance with the first part of Article 8 of the Constitution of Ukraine, and also characterizes the peculiarities of the internal organization of those bodies that embody the specified protection in their activities, exercising the appropriate powers granted to them by law on behalf of society. Among other forms of protection of civil rights, the judicial form of their protection is considered a priority, which determines the need to study this problem in the institutional aspect. According to modern scientific concepts, the continuity of the functioning of the judicial power corresponds to the judicial protection of civil rights, which carries out activities to resolve conflicts, protect the rights, freedoms and interests of individuals, ensures the continuity of the judicial review of the relevant category of cases and the judicial protection of civil rights.

Maintaining the regime of continuous functioning of the judicial power under modern conditions is of considerable public interest and has a significant political and legal significance in the conditions of martial law introduced in Ukraine from 24.02.2022 by Decree of the President of Ukraine dated 24.02.2022 No. 64/2022 “On the introduction of martial law in Ukraine” After all, even in these legal conditions, the judiciary must demonstrate the continuity of protection of human rights, including civil rights, which is confirmed both at the doctrinal and normative legal levels.

Keywords: civil rights, protection, civil justice, continuity, succession, institutional continuity.

    References:

  1. Antypova, I. L. (2021) Administratyvno-pravovyy status vyshchykh spetsializovanykh sudiv v Ukrayini [Administrative and legal status of higher specialized courts in Ukraine] : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.07 / NDI publichnoho prava. Kyiv, 243 p. [in Ukr.].
  2. Baybak, A. H. (2021) Vyznachenistʹ yak vlastyvistʹ prava [Certainty as a property of law] : avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.01 / Kharkiv. nats. un-t vnutr. sprav. Kharkiv, 20 p. [in Ukr.].
  3. Bilostotsʹkyy, S. (2021) Kontynuyitet sudovoyi vlady v konteksti suchasnoho ukrayinsʹkoho derzhavotvorennya [Continuity of judicial power in the context of modern Ukrainian state formation]. Slovo Natsionalʹnoyi shkoly suddiv Ukrayiny. № 3 (36), pp. 121-132. [in Ukr.].
  4. Bulkat, M. S. (2018) Teoretyko-pravovi zasady rozvytku ta funktsionuvannya sudovoyi vlady [Theoretical and legal foundations of the development and functioning of judiciary] : monohrafiya. Kyiv : Yuryd. dumka, 504 p. [in Ukr.].
  5. Hlushchenko, S. V. (2015) Vyshchi spetsializovani sudy v systemi sudovoyi vlady Ukrayiny: teoretyko-prykladne doslidzhennya [Higher specialized courts in the system of judicial power of Ukraine] : monohraf. Cherkasy : Chornobayivsʹke KPP, 352 p. [in Ukr.].
  6. Hordiyenko, I. L. (2021) Konstytutsionalizm yak rezhym pravovoho obmezhennya derzhavnoyi vlady [Constitutionalism as a regime of legal limitation of state power]: dys. … d-ra filos. 081- pravo / Nats. akad. vnutr. sprav. Kyiv, 262 p. [in Ukr.].
  7. Horodovenko, V. V. (2012) Pryntsypy sudovoyi vlady [Principles of judiciary] : monohrafiya. Kharkiv : Pravo, 448 p. [in Ukr.].
  8. Kobryn, V. S. (2013) Pryntsypy bezperervnosti ta nastupnosti v diyalʹnosti Premʺyer-Ministra Ukrayiny [Principles of continuity and succession in the activities of the Prime Minister of Ukraine]. Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorodsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu. Seriya PRAVO. Issue 22, Part I, Vol. 1., pp. 90-100. [in Ukr.].
  9. Konstytutsiyne pravo [Constitutional law] : pidruch. / Yu. H. Barabash, O. M. Boryslavsʹka, V. M. Venher, M. I. Kozyubra, A. A. Meleshevych ; za zah. red. M. I. Kozyubry Kyiv : Vaite, 2021. 528 p. [in Ukr.].
  10. Konstytutsiyne pravo Ukrayiny: prahmatychnyy kurs [Constitutional law of Ukraine: pragmatic course] : navch. posib. / M. V. Afanasʹyeva, Yu. Yu. Balʹtsiy, Yu. D. Batan ta in. ; za zah. red. M. V. Afanasʹyevoyi, A. A. Yezerova ; tekhn. red. Yu. D. Batan. Odesa : Yuryd. lit-ra, 2017. 256 p. [in Ukr.].
  11. Kostytsʹkyi, V. V. (2016) Do pytannya pro suchasnu derzhavu [To the issue of the modern state]. Sotsiolohiya prava. № 4 (19), pp. 3-10. [in Ukr.].
  12. Kostytsʹkyi, V. V. (2017) Peredmova do knyhy: Kostytsʹkyy V. V., Koban O. H. Obmezhennya pravom zakonodavchoyi ta sudovoyi vlady: monohrafiya [Preface to the book: Kostytskyi V. V., Koban O. H. Limitations by the law of legislative and judicial power : monograph]. Kyiv : Vydavnychyy dim «ArtEk», 228 p. [in Ukr.].
  13. Kostytsʹkyi, V. V. (2014) Sotsioloho-pravovi zasady orhanizatsiyi sudovoyi vlady [Sociological and legal foundations of the organization of judiciy]. Malyy i seredniy biznes. № 1-2, pp. 3- 10. [in Ukr.].
  14. Kostytsʹkyi, V. V. (2011) Sudova vlada: teoretyko-pravovi problemy rozpodilu vlady (vid Monteskʺye u XXI stolittya) [Judiciary: theoretical and legal problems of the distribution of power (from Montesquieu in the 21st century)]. Stanovlennya hospodarsʹkoyi yurysdyktsiyi v Ukrayini – 20 rokiv dosvidu. Problemy i perspektyvy : materialy nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Odesa, 24–26 trav. 2011 r.). Odesa : Astroprynt, pp. 68-73. [in Ukr.].
  15. Kostytsʹkyi, V. (2023) Podil vlady u konteksti teoloho-sotsiolohichnoho pravorozuminnya (narysy pravovoyi teoriyi) [Separation of power in the context of theological and sociological understanding of law (essays of legal theory)] : monohrafiya. Odesa : Vydavnychyy dim «Helʹvetyka», 192 p. [in Ukr.].
  16. Kroytor, V. A. (2020) Pryntsypy tsyvilʹnoho sudochynstva ta yikh systema: problemy suchasnoyi teoriyi i praktyky [Principles of civil justice and their system: problems of modern theory and practice] : monohrafiya. Kharkiv : Pravo, 672 p. [in Ukr.].
  17. Malyshev, B. V., Moskalyuk, O. V. (2010) Zastosuvannya norm prava (teoriya i praktyka) [Application of legal norms (theory and practice)] : navch. posib. ; za zah. red. B. V. Malysheva. Kyiv : Referat, 260 p. [in Ukr.].
  18. Marchuk, R. (2010) Pravovi pozytsiyi Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny ta stabilʹnistʹ (kontynuyitet) parlamentu [Legal positions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and the stability (continuity) of the parliament]. Persha mizhnarodna naukova konferentsiya «Parlament·sʹki chytannya». Kyiv : [B. v.], pp. 23-28 [in Ukr.].
  19. Pro pravotvorchu diyalʹnistʹ [On law-making activity] : Zakon Ukrayiny vid 24.08.2023. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3354-20#Text. [in Ukr.].
  20. Savchyn, M. Verkhovnyy sud : pytannya kontynuyitetu sudu ta dyskryminatsiyi suddiv [The Supreme Court: the issue of court continuity and discrimination of judges]. URL : https://yur gazeta.com/publications/practice/sudova-praktika/verhovniy-sud-pitannya-kontinuyitetu-sudu-i diskriminaciyi-suddiv.html. [in Ukr.].
  21. Savchyn, M. V. (2009) Konstytutsionalizm i pryroda konstytutsiyi [Constitutionalism and the nature of the constitution] : monohrafiya. Uzhhorod: Polihraftsentr «Lira», 372 p. [in Ukr.].
  22. Sydorenko, M. V. (2012) Sudovyy zakhyst tsyvilʹnoho prava ta interesu yak zahalʹna zasada tsyvilʹnoho zakonodavstva Ukrayiny [Judicial protection of civil right and interest as a general basis of civil legislation of Ukraine] : avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.03 / Nats. un-t «Odesʹka yurydychna akademiya». Odesa, 20 p. [in Ukr.].
  23. Sukhodubova, I. V. (2016) Stabilʹnistʹ i dynamizm zakonodavstva: ponyattya, spivvidnoshennya, zasoby zabezpechennya [Stability and dynamism of legislation: concept, relationship, means of ensuring] : monohrafiya ; nauk. red. O. V. Petryshyn. Kharkiv : Pravo, 228 p. [in Ukr.].
  24. Frytsʹkyi, Yu. O. (2006) Derzhavna vlada v Ukrayini: stanovlennya, orhanizatsiya, funktsionuvannya [State power in Ukraine: formation, organization, functioning] : monohrafiya. Dnipropetrovsʹk : Lira LTD, 360 p. [in Ukr.].
  25. Khotynsʹka-Nor, O. Z. (2016) Vplyv «maloyi sudovoyi reformy» na rozvytok sudovoyi systemy Ukrayiny : orhanizatsiyni aspekty [The influence of “small judicial reform” on the development of the judicial system of Ukraine: organizational aspects]. Sudova apelyatsiya. № 1, pp. 6-15. [in Ukr.].
  26. Tsyvilʹnyy protses Ukrayiny [Civil procedure of Ukraine] : pidruch. / kol. avt. ; za red. V. O. Kuchera. Lʹviv : LʹvDUVS, 2016. 768 p. [in Ukr.].
  27. Chorna, S. Z. (2021) Pravozakhysna funktsiya sudovoyi vlady v umovakh konstytsiynoyi reformy v suchasniy Ukrayini [The human rights function of the judiciary in the context of constitutional reform in modern Ukraine] : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.02 / Nats. aviats. un-t. Kyiv, 245 p. [in Ukr.].
  28. Yasynok, M. M. (2004) Pryntsypy usnosti, bezposerednosti ta bezperervnosti u tsyvilʹnomu sudochynstvi [Principles of orality, immediacy and continuity in civil justice] : avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.03 / Nats. un-t vnutr. sprav, 19 p. [in Ukr.].
Views: 23